ࡱ>    >+ !"$%&'(E*<=-./0123456789:;?@ABCDFJGHILMNOPQRSTUVWXYZRoot Entry ,{_ ITEM000  F0xD,{_1Table#CompObjj՜.+,0 hp|   5A  Title  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q%F\Object F4dMicrosoft Word DocumentD:\Youngs Bay final data\Stream reports\Lewis and Clark Tribs\Barrett Creek Report.docWordDocument"SummaryInformation( DocumentSummaryInformation8ITEM000FMTOh+'0x   ( 4 @ LX`hpssAdrianne SchackartdriNormale Todd Boswellcka2ddMicrosoft Word 10.0@ Z@_D}@@W:5@ 9bjbj22 "XX96666666      66666666$ R f66666666666F66666l66l6* F_ |"l0 l{ { lJ$n6666{ 6l 6666666   Upper Nehalem Watershed Habitat Assessment Stream Report STREAM: Maynard Creek SUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River DATES: March 16, 2006 SURVEY CREW: Trevor Diemer, Ben Walczak REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben Walczak GENE CONSERVATION GROUP: 1-NC UTM COORDINATES: Start 0475899 E & 5080019 N End 0475639 E & 5079303 N USGS MAPS: Clear Creek GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Maynard Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with Rock Creek and extends 814 meters. One reach was designated based on: Valley width and Channel morphology. Riffles (60%), rapids (29%), and scour pools (22%) dominated the habitat, while sand (16%), gravel (50%), and bedrock (18%) were the dominant substrate types. The survey begins at the confluence with Rock Creek and The stream runs through timberland. The survey starts out as marginal habitat for coho, but as the gradient increases the second half contained little suitable habitat. ends after multiple steps due to a lack of flow. REACH DESCRIPTIONS: REACH 1: Length 814 meters. The channel is constrained by moderate hillslopes in a narrow valley. The average valley width index is 1.2. Land use for the reach is second growth timber with a subdominant land use of large timber. The average unit gradient is 3.2%. The channel characteristics include: primary 814m and secondary 25m. Zero pools were greater than 1 meter deep. There was a low amount of LWD with ten logs greater or equal to 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 1.2 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 30 - 50 cm dbh, with grass vegetation This survey begins in timberland. The stream is dominated by sand, gravel, and bedrock. Maynard Creek has marginal habitat throughout and is lacking in pools and large wood. There is poor LWD project potential with little access for industrial equipment. The riparian area in this section has excellent riparian shade creating poor riparian enhancement project potential. C 0 9h7kh`5CJ\h`/BC[\{| 0 Q R j k   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!9 579!! !!!!! 1h/ =!"#$%NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DAD Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List  z z6x/BC[\{|0QRjkdfz{@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List 9 z zV9f/BC[\{|0QRjk  57;00000000 0000 000 00 000 00 0 00 0 00 00 00 0 0 M90M909  9 9 `d; ;::4; ;Todd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellMark McLaughlin7k`@  Ӓvv  9@@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial"qhÜk::!>4d55 3H(?{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f36\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f37\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f39\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f40\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f41\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f42\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f43\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f44\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\qlOle 5OlePres000,lITEM000ODS ITEM000FMT#3 F%*_%*_;V*   }."Systemr0E -@Times New Roman-  2 Zp -- 2 p , 2 ,p , 2 Xp ,@Times New Roman-J2 *pUpper Nehalem Watershed Habitat AssessmentTAA44T4A:!4`u;'44.A3A[;@!&;'T--4..`4A' 2 p > 2 ep , 2 e,p , 2 eXp , 2 ep , 2 ep ,2 e pStream ReportA'44;`T4A;4' 2 ep > 2 p ?-,2 _pSTREAM: Maynard Creek8=C=HYY-02,!2C"-,2 2 _Tp \ 2 _p - 2 p -82 EpSUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River8HBBH9 HH22,!H,3,,NC2,! 2 Ep . 2 p -.2 +pDATES: March 16, 2006 HH==8Y,!,2222232 2 +%p - 2 p -G2 (pSURVEY CREW: Trevor Diemer, Ben Walczak8HCH=HCC=_=!,22!H,N,!B,2_,,-,3 2 p - 2 p -;2  pREPORT PREPARED BY: Ben WalczakC=8HC=8C<8HC=HBHB,2_,,-,2 2 p . 2 jp -/2 pGENE CONSERVATION GROUP:H=H=CHH8=CHH> IHHCHH8 2 p ' 2 p12 2 p-!2 /pNCHC 2 p - 2 Pp -#2 pUTM COORDINATES:H=YCHHCI HH==8 2 p 2 pStart 8,! 2 p2.2 p 0475899 E & 5080019 N 2222222=M2232222H 2  p - 2 6p , 2 6,p , 2 6Xp , 2 6p ,2 6pEnd =22 2 6jp2.2 6p 0475639 E & 5079303 N 2222222=M2232222H 2 6 p - 2 p -.2  pUSGS MAPS: Clear CreekH8H8YH88B,,!C!-,2 2  Wp - 2 p -)2  pGENERAL DESCRIPTION:H=H=CI<H=8CD8>!HH 2  p - 2 u p - 2 p ,|2 ,KpThe Maynard Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with Rock =2,Y.02,!2D!,,2H2,!2,2,'2!2.03-12'-',22!2,2,,H2C2-2X2 [ 3pCreek and extends 814 meters. One reach was designC!,,2,22,3,22'222M,,!'H2,!,-,2H,'3,(12;2 [ j pated based on: Valley width and ,,23,',222H,.0H22,222 VpChannel morphology. Riffles (60%), rapids (29%), and scour pools (22%) dominated the C2,22,N2!222230C!!,'!22T!!,22'!23S",22',22!222'!22T!22N2,,22,2 A Wphabitat, while sand (16%), gravel (50%), and bedrock (18%) were the dominant substrate 2,2,H2,',22!22T!2!,2,!23S!-222,2"2,2!22S!H,",2,22N2,2'22'!,,2 ptypes.02,' 2 p . 2 ' p -L2 +pThe survey begins at the confluence with Ro=2,'2!2.02-12',2,,22!2,2-,H2C22  pck Creek ,2C",,22 ypand ,22/2 " pThe stream runs through =3,'!,,N!22'2!22122  ptimberland.N2,!,22z2 Jp The survey starts out as marginal habitat for coho, but as the gradient =2,'2!2.0(,!'22,'N,"12,2,2,!2!,22222,'2,2",2,22 ^pincreases the second half contained little suitable habitat. ends after multiple steps due to 2,!,,(,'2,',,2223,!,22,2,2,'2,2,2,2,,22',!-!N22,',2'22,2%2 pa lack of flow. h,,,22!!2H 2 sp  2 p . 2 fp , 2 f,p -(2 pREACH DESCRIPTIONS:oC=HCHH=8CD8> HI8 2 Jp , 2 Lp -2 pREACH 1:C=HCH2 2 p - 2 2p - 2 p ,2 ,pLength :<,312 2 _p2s2 Ep 814 meters. The channel is constrained by moderate hillslopes in a 222N,,!'=3,,2,23,',22'!,2,230N22,",,2'22,'2,2 Ypnarrow valley. The average valley width index is 1.2. Land use for the reach is second e2,!!2H3,.0=2,,3,",2,2,.0H2222,3'22;,322',!2!3,!-,,2'',,2222 Mpgrowth timber with a subdominant land use of large timber. The average unit 1!3H2N2,!H2,'2222N2,2,222',2!,"2,N2,!=2,,3,!-2,232 : pgradient is 1!,2,2'2 Rp3.2%. The channel characteristics include: primary 814m and secondary 25m. Zero 22S=2,,3,22,,3,!-,,!','2,22,2!N,"0222N,22(,,222-#032N<-!22 qSppools were greater than 1 meter deep. There was a low amount of LWD with ten logs a222'H,!,1",,-!2,23N,,!2,,2=2,",H,',2H,N2222!;_HI2,221'2 Opgreater or equal to 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 1.2 key pieces per 100m. The1",,-!2!,23,222N222NH2,2,2,"-1,'3222-02,,,'3,!222O=2, 2  p 2 WUpvegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the e2,2,,22'2,',2222"2,!,2!,2'-,'=2,"-,'!2222N2'!!,23,2022,-NANIcm dbh.r22,N222 2  C- 2 p C--NANI  2 K8 C2 d 8 50 cm dbh.r  %  2 N8 C 2 8 C-NANI  -NANI  %  \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\ITEM000FMTRich Text Format8)Ole  OlePres000K*#3Rich Text Formatat;lXp!langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid7026612\rsid10449988\rsid14901452} \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\rsidroot14901452 \fet0\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1 \pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5 \pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid14901452 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 \tab \tab \tab }{\b\fs28\insrsid14901452 Upper Nehalem Watershed Habitat Assessment \par \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab Stream Report \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 STREAM: Maynard Creek\tab \par \par SUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River \par \par DATES: March 16, 2006 \par \par SURVEY CREW: Trevor Diemer, Ben Walczak \par \par REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben Walczak \par \par GENE CONSERVATION GROUP:\tab 1-NC \par \par UTM COORDINATES:\tab Start \endash 0475899 E & 5080019 N \par \tab \tab \tab \tab End \endash 0475639 E & 5079303 N \par \par USGS MAPS: Clear Creek \par \par GENERAL DESCRIPTION: \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 \tab The Maynard Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with Rock Creek and extends 814 meters. One reach was design ated based on: Valley width and Channel morphology. Riffles (60%), rapids (29%), and scour pools (22%) dominated the habitat, while sand (16%), gravel (50%), and bedrock (18%) were the dominant substrate types. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 The survey begins at the confluence with Rock Creek }{\insrsid7026612 and }{\insrsid14901452 The stream runs through timberland.}{\insrsid7026612 The survey starts out as marginal habitat for coho, but as the gradient increases the second half contained little suitable habitat. ends after`Adrianne Schackart Todd Boswell multiple steps due to a lack of flow. }{\insrsid14901452 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 \tab \par REACH DESCRIPTIONS: \par \par REACH 1: \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 \tab Length \endash 814 meters. The channel is constrained by moderate hillslopes in a narrow valley. The average valley width inde x is 1.2. Land use for the reach is second growth timber with a subdominant land use of large timber. The average unit gradient is 3.2%. The channel characteristics include: primary 814m and secondary 25m. Zero pools were greater than 1 meter deep. T h ere was a low amount of LWD with ten logs greater or equal to 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 1.2 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduo us ranging from 30 - 50 cm dbh, with grass vegetation \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 This survey begins in timberland. The stream is dominated by sand, gravel, and bedrock. Maynard Creek has marginal habitat throughout and is lacking in pools and large wood. There is poor LWD project potential with little access for industrial equipment. The riparian area in this section has excellent riparian shade creating poor riparian enhancement project potential. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid14901452 \par }}ey begins in timberland. The stream is dominated by sand, gravel, and bedrock. Maynard Creek has marginal habitat throughout and is lacking in pools and large wood. There is poor LWD project potential with little access for industrial equipment. The riparian area in this section has excellent rip;V X  }."Systemr0E -@Times New Roman-  2 Zp s-- 2 p s, 2 ,p s, 2 Xp s,@Times New Roman-J2 *pUpper Nehalem Watershed Habitat AssessmentTAA44T4A:!4`u;'44.A3A[;@!&;'T--4..`4A' 2 p s> 2 ep s, 2 e,p s, 2 eXp s, 2 ep s, 2 ep s,2 e pStream ReportA'44;`T4A;4' 2 ep s> 2 p s?-,2 _pSTREAM: Maynard Creek8=C=HYY-02,!2C"-,2 2 _Tp s\ 2 _p s- 2 p s-82 EpSUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River8HBBH9 HH22,!H,3,,NC2,! 2 Ep s. 2 p s-.2 +pDATES: March 16, 2006 HH==8Y,!,2222232 2 +%p s- 2 p s-G2 (pSURVEY CREW: Trevor Diemer, Ben Walczak8HCH=HCC=_=!,22!H,N,!B,2_,,-,3 2 p s- 2 p s-;2  pREPORT PREPARED BY: Ben WalczakC=8HC=8C<8HC=HBHB,2_,,-,2 2 p s. 2 jp s-/2 pGENE CONSERVATION GROUP:H=H=CHH8=CHH> IHHCHH8 2 p s' 2 p1s2 2 p-s!2 /pNCHC 2 p s- 2 Pp s-#2 pUTM COORDINATES:H=YCHHCI HH==8 2 p s2 pStart 8,! 2 ps2.2 p 0475899 E & 5080019 N 2222222=M2232222H 2  p s- 2 6p s, 2 6,p s, 2 6Xp s, 2 6p s,2 6pEnd =22 2 6jps2.2 6p 0475639 E & 5079303 N 2222222=M2232222H 2 6 p s- 2 p s-.2  pUSGS MAPS: Clear CreekH8H8YH88B,,!C!-,2 2  Wp s- 2 p s-)2  pGENERAL DESCRIPTION:H=H=CI<H=8CD8>!HH 2  p s- 2 u p s- 2 p s,|2 ,KpThe Maynard Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with Rock =2,Y.02,!2D!,,2H2,!2,2,'2!2.03-12'-',22!2,2,,H2C2-2X2 [ 3pCreek and extends 814 meters. One reach was designC!,,2,22,3,22'222M,,!'H2,!,-,2H,'3,(12;2 [ j pated based on: Valley width and ,,23,',222H,.0H22,222 VpChannel morphology. Riffles (60%), rapids (29%), and scour pools (22%) dominated the C2,22,N2!222230C!!,'!22T!!,22'!23S",22',22!222'!22T!22N2,,22,2 A Wphabitat, while sand (16%), gravel (50%), and bedrock (18%) were the dominant substrate 2,2,H2,',22!22T!2!,2,!23S!-222,2"2,2!22S!H,",2,22N2,2'22'!,,2 ptypes.02,' 2 p s. 2 ' p s-L2 +pThe survey begins at the confluence with Ro =2,'2!2.02-12',2,,22!2,2-,H2C22  pck Creek ,2C",,22 ypand ,22/2 " pThe stream runs through =3,'!,,N!22'2!22122  ptimberland.N2,!,2242 p The survey starts out as =2,'2!2.0(,!'22,'2 pmarginalN,"12, 2 (p s2 Aphabitat 2,2,82 kpfor coho, but as the gradient !2!,22222,'2,2",2,2g2 =pincreases the second half contained little suitable habitat. 2,!,,(,'2,',,2223,!,22,2,2,'2,2,2,2,=2 !pends after multiple steps due to ,22',!-!N22,',2'22,2#2 pa lack of flow. ,,,22!!2H 2 Zp s 2 sp s 2 p s. 2 fp s, 2 f,p s-(2 pREACH DESCRIPTIONS:oC=HCHH=8CD8> HI8 2 Jp s, 2 Lp s-2 pREACH 1:C=HCH2 2 p s- 2 2p s- 2 p s,2 ,pLength :<,312 2 _ps2s2 Ep 814 meters. The channel is constrained by moderate hillslopes in a 222N,,!'=3,,2,23,',22'!,2,230N22,",,2'22,'2,O2 -pnarrow valley. The average valley width inde2,!!2H3,.0=2,,3,",2,2,.0H2222,M2 -,px is 1.2. Land use for the reach is second 3'22;,322',!2!3,!-,,2'',,2222 Ypgrowth timber with a subdominant land use of large timber. The average unit gradient is 1!3H2N2,!H2,'2222N2,2,222',2!,"2,N2,!=2,,3,!-2,231!,2,2'2 Rp3.2%. The channel characteristics include: primary 814m and secondary 25m. Zero 22S=2,,3,22,,3,!-,,!','2,22,2!N,"0222N,22(,,222-#032N<-!2I2 q)ppools were greater than 1 meter deep. Thn222'H,!,1",,-!2,23N,,!2,,2=2J2 q*pere was a low amount of LWD with ten logs ,",H,',2H,N2222!;_HI2,221'2 Ppgreater or equal to 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 1.2 key pieces per 100m. The 1",,-!2!,23,222N222NH2,2,2,"-1,'3222-02,,,'3,!222O=2,2 WUpvegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the e2,2,,22'2,',2222"2,!,2!,2'-,'=2,"-,'!2222N2'!!,23,2022,-NANI