ࡱ>    >+ !"#$%'()*J=-./0123456789:;?@ABCDEFGHIKRLMNOPQSTVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdRoot Entry 0<ӕ ITEM000  F0xD0<ӕ1Table&fCompObjj՜.+,0 hp|    A  Title  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q%F\Object F4dMicrosoft Word DocumentD:\Youngs Bay final data\Stream reports\Lewis and Clark Tribs\Barrett Creek Report.docWordDocument" SummaryInformation( DocumentSummaryInformation8Oh+'0x   ( 4 @ LX`hpssAdrianne SchackartdriNormale Todd Boswellcka2ddMicrosoft Word 10.0@G@_D}@fӕ@lgӕ? 5@ bjbj22 " XX4444 @ ````````A C C C C C C $Rfg  `` g ``|    :``A  A   ! ! `T ӕ4 .! A 0 ! fA (f! $f! ` l ```g g d4i 4 Upper Nehalem Habitat Assessment Stream Report STREAM: Adams Creek SUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River DATES: February 8, 2006 SURVEY CREW: Todd Boswell, Mark McLaughlin REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben Walczak GENE CONSERVATION GROUP: 1-NC UTM COORDINATES: Start 0477125 E & 5095250 N End 0477550 E & 5095850 N USGS MAPS: Pittsburg GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Adams Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the Nehalem River and extends 1,635 meters. Two reaches were designated based on: Valley form. Scour pools (23%), Glides (27%), and Riffles (49%) dominated the habitat in reach 1, while Silt/organics (22%), Sand (39%) and Bedrock (23%) were the dominant substrate types. The habitat in reach 2 was dominated by Riffles (23%) and Dammed and backwater pools (75%), while Silt/organics (46%), Sand (34%), and Gravel (17%) dominated the substrate. REACH DESCRIPTIONS: REACH 1: Length 454 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces in a broad valley. The average valley width index is 20.0. Land use for the reach is rural residential. The average unit gradient is 0.1%. The channel characteristics include: primary 454m and secondary 13m. Five pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 11.0 pools per kilometer of primary channel length. There was a small amount of LWD with one log greater or equal to 12m x .6m, which averages to 0.2 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 15 30 cm dbh, with some deciduous 30 50 cm dbh. This survey begins at the confluence with the Nehalem River. The riparian is degraded near a Hwy 47 at the survey start. The habitat improves above the road crossing, with good shade from alders and some conifers. There was a good amount of spawning gravel, but the stream lacks future LWD recruitment and deep complex pools. The reach ends at the start of a beaver complex. The reach has good potential for a LWD placement project with easy access. The good gravel and low gradient really gives this reach excellent potential for a future restoration project. Below Hwy 47, the riparian is dominated by blackberries with almost no shade with a power-line crossing. So, a planting project in the first 300m would be beneficial. REACH 2: Length 579 meters. The channel was constrained by steep V-shaped hillslopes in a narrow valley floor. The average valley width index is 2.0. Land use for the reach is second growth timber. A sub dominant land use of young timber was also noted. The average unit gradient is 3.2%. The channel characteristics include: primary 579m and secondary 32m. Zero pools were greater than 1m deep. There was a small amount of LWD in the stream with one piece greater than 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 0.2 pieces per 100m of primary channel. Reach 2 begins as the stream leaves the beaver complex. The reach consists primarily of rapids with no pools and is scoured to bedrock. Little to no gravel is present. As was also the case of Reach 1, there was a past timber harvest that is older than five years on the hillslope just beyond the 30m buffer zone. The survey ended at an ODFW Spawning Survey sign end point in conjunction with a spring seep on the right where there is a large mass failure that is contributing heavy silt load to the stream. The reach has good potential for a LWD placement project, but poor access for industrial equipment. The limited access may be the biggest drawback to planning a future restoration project. The good gravel and low gradient really gives this reach excellent potential. The riparian has a nice mix of small conifers and medium sized alders creating future LWD recruitment. So, a planting project is not necessary. 9 hUBKhUBKhUBK5CJ\h#p5CJ\hUBK%89OPop) J K b c x y } ~ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! fgGHQRpqpq !!!!!!!!!!!!!!gdUBK 1h/ =!"#$%000000000000000000000000000@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List H@H #p Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ  z zg{%89OPop)JKbcxy}~fgG H Q R p q p q 0000000000 00000 000000 00 00 0 00 00 0 0 0p00p00000 0p00      |̟ | |,- |||,|!|"|'|y|6|\>|:|,:[[aiyWW    `hnn``  8 *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity8 *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsdate=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType= *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags Ole 5OlePres000,ITEM000ODS ITEM000FMT;V E  }."System8$r0E -@Times New Roman-  2 Zp -- 2 p , 2 ,p , 2 Xp ,@Times New Roman- 2 pUpper Nehalem TAA44T4A:!4`&2 pHabitat Assessment[;A!&;'T.-4-.`4A' 2 p ? 2 ep , 2 e,p , 2 eXp , 2 ep , 2 ep ,2 e pStream ReportA'44;`T4A;4' 2 ep > 2 p ?-)2 _pSTREAM: Adams Creek8=C=HYH2,N'C!,-2 2 _p 2 _p - 2 p -82 EpSUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River8HBBH9 HH22,!H,3,,NC2,! 2 Ep . 2 p -12 +pDATES: February 8, 2006RHH==87,2!3,#022322 2 +Wp - 2 p -L2 +pSURVEY CREW: Todd Boswell, Mark McLaughlin8HCH=HCC=_=221B2'H,Y,!2Z-<,3222 2 ^p - 2 p -;2  pREPORT PREPARED BY: Ben WalczakC=8HC=8C<8HC=HBHB,2_,,-,2 2 p . 2 jp -/2 pGENE CONSERVATION GROUP:H=H=CHH8=CHH> IHHCHH8 2 p ' 2 p12 2 p-!2 /pNCHC 2 p - 2 Pp -2 pUTM COO:H=YCHH2  pRDINATES:CI HH==8 2 p 2 pStart 8,! 2 p2.2 p 0477125 E & 5095250 N 2222222=M2232222H 2  p - 2 6p , 2 6,p , 2 6Xp , 2 6p ,2 6pEnd =22 2 6jp2.2 6p 0477550 E & 5095850 N 2222222=M2232222H 2 6 p - 2 p -,2  pUSGS MAPS: Pittsburg H8H8YH888'22!1 2  p - 2 p -)2  pGENERAL DESCRIPTION:H=H=CI<H=8CD8>!HH 2  p - 2 u p - 2 p ,2 ,PpThe Adams Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the Nehalem =2,H2,N'C!-,2H2,"2,2,'2!2.02-12',',22!2,2,,H22,I,2,,N\2 [ 6pRiver and extends 1,635 meters. Two reaches were desiC2,!,22,3,22'2222N,,!'=H2",,,3,'H-!,2,':2 [ pgnated based on: Valley form. k12,,23,',222H,.0!2!N2 UpScour pools (23%), Glides (27%), and Riffles (49%) dominated the habitat in reach 1, l8,22!222'!22S!H2-'!22S!,22C!!,'!23S!22N2,,22,2,2,2!,,,222 A Tpwhile Silt/organics (22%), Sand (39%) and Bedrock (23%) were the dominant substrate H2,82!1,2,'!22T!8,22!22S!,22C,2!3,2!22S!H,",2,22N2,2'22'!,,_2 8ptypes. The habitat in reach 2 was dominated by Riffles 02,'=3,2,2,2!--,22H,'22N2,,240D!!,'+2 p(23%) and Dammed and !22S!,22H,NN-2,222 ' Opbackwater pools (75%), while Silt/organics (46%), Sand (34%), and Gravel (17%) 2,,2H,,!222'!22T!H2,82!1,2,'!22T!8,22!22S!,22H",2-!22S!/2 pdominated the substrate.22N2,,22,'22'!,, 2 p . 2 p -(2 pREACH DESCRIPTIONS:rC=HCHH=8CD8> HI8 2 Jp , 2 p -2 fpREACH 1:C=HCH2 2 fp - 2 p - 2 Lp ,2 L,pLength :<,312 2 L_p2y2 LIp 454 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces in a broad valley. (222N,,!'=3,,2,23,',22'!,2,230,"!-,,'2,2!3,22,-0%2 pThe average valleS=2,,2-!-1,3,.y2 Ipy width index is 20.0. Land use for the reach is rural residential. The (0H2322,3'222;,222(,!2!2,!-,,2'!3!,!,'2,2,=2,2 2Vpaverage unit gradient is 0.1%. The channel characteristics include: primary 454m and ,2,!-2,222!,2,2'32S=2,,3,22,,3,!--,!','2,22,2!N,#1222N,222 Xpsecondary 13m. Five pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 11.0 pools ',,222,#022N72,232'H,!,1",,-!2,22O,,!2-,2H2,2,3,"-1-'2222222'2  pper kilom2,!22Nz2 Jpeter of primary channel length. There was a small amount of LWD with one ,,!2!3!N,#0,2,22,,312=2-!,I,','N,,N2222!;`HH222,2 Splog greater or equal to 12m x .6m, which averages to 0.2 key pieces per 100m. The o211!-,,!3!,22,223N32NH2,2,2,!,2,(2222-02-,,'2-!232N=2,2 Upvegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the l2,2,,22'2,',2222"2,!,2!,2'-,'=2,"-,'!2222N2'!!,23,2022, 2 qpriparian zone !2,!,2-22,[2 q%5pwere mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 15 eH-!,N2'0N3,2'-,'2!2,,2222'!,3121!!2N22 2 q p2%2 q p 30 cm dbh, with S22,N222H2&2 psome deciduous 30 '2N,2,,2222'22 2 p22 I p 50 cm dbh.22,N222 2 "p - 2 Wp --NANI2 8 C 2 8 C-NANI         $   $ % !  $  $$. 2 8 [r Spawning Survey start point ${\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;} {\f36\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f37\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f39\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f40\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;} {\f41\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New ITEM000FMT#3 F ӕ ӕITEM000FMTRich Text Format8<$Ole  OlePres000U#3Rich Text Formatat;lXp!Roman (Hebrew);}{\f42\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f43\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f44\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);} {\f386\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f387\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Tahoma Cyr;}{\f389\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f390\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma Tur;}{\f391\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);} {\f392\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f393\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;}{\f394\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f395\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma (Thai);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255; \red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0; \red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \ssemihidden \styrsid7349200 Balloon Text;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid4932181\rsid7033650\rsid7349200} \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\rsidroot4932181 \fet0\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1 \pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5 \pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid4932181 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \tab \tab \tab }{\b\fs28\insrsid7349200 Upper Nehalem }{\b\fs28\insrsid4932181 Habitat Assessment \par \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab Stream Report \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 STREAM: Adams Creek\tab \par \par SUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River \par \par DATES: February 8, 2006 \par \par SURVEY CREW: Todd Boswell, Mark McLaughlin \par \par REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben Walczak \par \par GENE CONSERVATION GROUP:\tab 1-NC \par \par UTM COORDINATES:\tab Start \endash 0477125 E & 5095250 N \par \tab \tab \tab \tab End \endash 0477550 E & 5095850 N \par \par USGS MAPS: Pittsburg \par \par GENERAL DESCRIPTION: \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \tab The Adams Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the Nehalem River and extends 1,635 meters. Two reaches were designated based on: Valley form. Scour pools (23%), Glides (27%), and Riffles (49%) dominated the habitat in reach 1, while Silt/organics (22%), Sand (39%) and Bedrock (23%) were the dominant substrate types. The habitat in reach 2 was dominated by Riffles (23%) and Dammed and backwater pools (75%), while Silt/organics (46%), Sand (34%), and Gravel (17%) dominated the substrate. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \par REACH DESCRIPTIONS: \par \par REACH 1: \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \tab Length \endash 454 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces in a broad valley. The ave rage valley width index is 20.0. Land use for the reach is rural residential. The average unit gradient is 0.1%. The channel characteristics include: primary 454m and secondary 13m. Five pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 11.0 pool s per kilometer of primary channel length. There was a small amount of LWD with one log greater or equal to 12m x .6m, which averages to 0.2 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the rip arian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 15 \endash 30 cm dbh, with some deciduous 30 \endash 50 cm dbh. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspPlaceName9 *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace 220068DayMonthYear    W` $tyG \ ::$*PpTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon Boswellalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 This survey begins at the confluence with the Nehalem River. The riparian is degraded near a Hwy 47 at the survey start. The habitat improves above the road crossing, with good shade from alders and some conifers. There was a good amount of spawning gravel, but the stream lacks future LWD recruitment and deep complex pools.}{\insrsid4932181\charrsid4932181 }{\insrsid4932181 The reach ends at the start of a beaver complex. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 The reach has good potential for a LWD placement project with easy access. The good gravel and low gradient really gives this reach excellent potential for a future restoration project. Below Hwy 47, the riparian is dominated by blackberries with almost no shade with a pow er-line crossing. So, a planting project in the first 300m would be beneficial. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \par REACH 2: \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \tab Length \endash 579 meters. The channel was constrained by steep V-shaped hillslopes in a narrow valley floor. The average valley width index is 2.0. Land use for the reach is second growth timber. A sub dominant land use of young timber was also noted. The average unit gradient is 3.2%. The channel characteristics include: primary 579m and secondary 32m. Zero pools were greater than 1m deep. There was a small amo unt of LWD in the stream with one piece greater than 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 0.2 pieces per 100m of primary channel. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 Reach 2 begins as the stream leaves the beaver complex. The reach consists primarily of rapids with no pools and is scoured to bedro ck. Little to no gravel is present. As was also the case of Reach 1, there was a past timber harvest that is older than five years on the hillslope just beyond the 30m buffer zone. The survey ended at an ODFW Spawning Survey sign end point in conjuncti on with a spring seep on the right where there is a large mass failure that is contributing heavy silt load to the stream. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4932181 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid4932181 {\insrsid4932181 The reach has good potential for a LWD placement project, but poor access for industrial equipment. The limited access may be the bi ggest drawback to planning a future restoration project. The good gravel and low gradient really gives this reach excellent potential. The riparian has a nice mix of small conifers and medium sized alders creating future LWD recruitment. So, a planting project is not necessary. \par }}         $   $ % X2 38 River and extends 1,658 meters. Two reaches were df!      % $  $ >2 ,"8 esignated based on: ValleyTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellMark McLaughlinUBK#p@ӒP@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial5& zaTahoma"qhll? ? !24d   3H(?UBKAdrianne Schackart Todd Boswell2 8 REACH DESCRIPTIONS::!#!$ $!!$$ 2 %8 C 2 M8 C;V f  }."Systemr0E -@Times New Roman-  2 Zp -- 2 p , 2 ,p , 2 Xp ,@Times New Roman-2 pUpper TAA44 2 pNT2 3 pehalem River 4A:!4`T!;44&2 pHabitat Assessment[;@!&;'T-.4-.`4A' 2 p ? 2 ep , 2 e,p , 2 eXp , 2 ep , 2 ep ,2 e pStream ReportA'44;`T4A;4' 2 ep > 2 p ?-)2 _pSTREAM: Adams Creek8=C=HYH2,N'C!,-2 2 _p 2 _p - 2 p -82 EpSUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River8HBBH9 HH22,!H,3,,NC2,! 2 Ep . 2 p -12 +pDATES: February 8, 2006RHH==87,2!3,#022322 2 +Wp - 2 p -L2 +pSURVEY CREW: Todd Boswell, Mark McLaughlind8HCH=HCC=_=221B2'H,Y,!2Z-<,3222 2 ^p - 2 p -;2  pREPORT PREPARED BY: Ben WalczakC=8HC=8C<8HC=HBHB,2_,,-,2 2 p . 2 jp -/2 pGENE CONSERVATION GROUP:H=H=CHH8=CHH> IHHCHH8 2 p ' 2 p12 2 p-! 2 /pNH 2 wpCC 2 p - 2 Pp -#2 pUTM COORDINATES:H=YCHHCI HH==8 2 p 2 pStart 8,! 2 p2.2 p 0477125 E & 5095250 N :2222222=M2232222H 2  p - 2 6p , 2 6,p , 2 6Xp , 2 6p ,2 6pEnd =22 2 6jp2.2 6p 0477550 E & 5095850 N :2222222=M2232222H 2 6 p - 2 p -,2  pUSGS MAPS: Pittsburg H8H8YH888'22!1 2  p - 2 p -)2  pGENERAL DESCRIPTION:H=H=CI<H=8CD8>!HH 2  p - 2 u p - 2 p ,2 ,PpThe Adams Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the Nehalem =2,H2,N'C!-,2H2,"2,2,'2!2.02-12',',22!2,2,,H22,I,2,,NM2 [ ,pRiver and extends 1,635 meters. Two reachesC2,!,22,3,22'2222N,,!'=H2",,,3,'I2 [ 6)p were designated based on: Valley form. hH-!,2,'12,,23,',222H,.0!2!N2 UpScour pools (23%), Glides (27%), and Riffles (49%) dominated the habitat in reach 1, l8,22!222'!22S!H2-'!22S!,22C!!,'!23S!22N2,,22,2,2,2!,,,222 A Tpwhile Silt/organics (22%), Sand (39%) and Bedrock (23%) were the dominant substrate H2,82!1,2,'!22T!8,22!22S!,22C,2!3,2!22S!H,",2,22N2,2'22'!,,P2 .ptypes. The habitat in reach 2 was dominated b02,'=3,2,2,2!--,22H,'22N2,,24:2 Fpy Riffles (23%) and Dammed and k0D!!,'!22S!,22H,NN-2,222 ' Opbackwater pools (75%), while Silt/organics (46%), Sand (34%), and Gravel (17%) 2,,2H,,!222'!22T!H2,82!1,2,'!22T!8,22!22S!,22H",2-!22S!/2 pdominated the substrate.22N2,,22,'22'!,, 2 p . 2 p -(2 pREACH DESCRIPTIONS:rC=HCHH=8CD8> HI8 2 Jp , 2 p -2 fpREACH 1:C=HCH2 2 fp - 2 p - 2 Lp ,2 L,pLength :<,312 2 L_p2y2 LIp 454 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces in a broad valley. (222N,,!'=3,,2,23,',22'!,2,230,"!-,,'2,2!3,22,-02 pThe ave:=2,,2-2 ?Sprage valley width index is 20.0. Land use for the reach is rural residential. The !-1,3,.0H2322,3'222;,222(,!2!2,!-,,2'!3!,!,'2,2,=2,2 2Vpaverage unit gradient is 0.1%. The channel characteristics include: primary 454m and ,2,!-2,222!,2,2'32S=2,,3,22,,3,!--,!','2,22,2!N,#1222N,222 Wpsecondary 13m. Five pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 11.0 pools',,222,#022N72,232'H,!,1",,-!2,22O,,!2-,2H2,2,3,"-1-'2222222' 2  p 2 Spper kilometer of primary channel length. There was a small amount of LWD with one o2,!22N,,!2!3!N,#0,2,22,,312=2-!,I,','N,,N2222!;`HH222,2 Splog greater or equal to 12m x .6m, which averages to 0.2 key pieces per 100m. The o211!-,,!3!,22,223N32NH2,2,2,!,2,(2222-02-,,'2-!232N=2,2 Upvegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the l2,2,,22'2,',2222"2,!,2!,2'-,'=2,"-,'!2222N2'!!,23,2022,2 qpripa!2,j2 q?prian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 15 !,2-22,H-!,N2'0N3,2'-,'2!2,,2222'!,3121!!2N22 2 q p2%2 q p 30 cm dbh, with S22,N222H2&2 psome deciduous 30 '2N,2,,2222'22 2 p22 I p 50 cm dbh.22,N222 2 "p - 2 Wp --NANI