╨╧рб▒с>■   ■                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   ¤     ■   ■   >+■    !"#$%■   '()*K=-./0123456789:;<■   ■   ■   @ABCDEFGHIJRLMN■   PQVSTU■   WXYZ[\]^_`abc■                                                                                                                   Root Entry         тК Ф╟ АITEM000      └F0йxD╣─╞тК Ф╟1Table    &cCompObj            j■ ╒═╒Ь.УЧ+,∙о0ш hp|ДМФ Ьдм┤ ╝ ╔ф 9A  Title■   ■   ■   ■   ■                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           ■       └FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8Ї9▓q%└F\Object └F4dMicrosoft Word DocumentD:\Youngs Bay final data\Stream reports\Lewis and Clark Tribs\Barrett Creek Report.docWordDocument            " SummaryInformation(     DocumentSummaryInformation8                        ■   ■ рЕЯЄ∙OhлС+'│┘0hРШд░╝╚╪ Ё№  $ 0 <HPX`фssBenenNormal Todd Boswello2ddMicrosoft Word 10.0@dЙ@╚_Dй}┼@h┤Ф╟@╠= Ф╟F· ье┴5@ Ё┐@bjbj╧2╧2 " нXнX@      И6666666ЖJJJJ VЖ╢vvvvvvvvТ Ф Ф Ф Ф Ф Ф $╔RH╕ 6L vvL L ╕ 66vv═ ╘ ╘ ╘ L R6v6vТ ╘ L Т ╘ в╘ v 66v vj @dL Ф╟JЮ v Т у 0v cи "cv J$n6666c6v vЇjо╘  Мд иvvv╕ ╕ ЖЖ─J╩ ЖЖJ Upper Nehalem Watershed Habitat Assessment Stream Report STREAM: Unnamed Tributary (before Adams Creek) SUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River DATES: February 15, 2006 SURVEY CREW: Todd Boswell, Mark McLaughlin REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben Walczak GENE CONSERVATION GROUP: 1-NC UTM COORDINATES: Start Ц 0476587 E & 5095462 N End Ц 0476746 E & 5096211 N USGS MAPS: Marshland GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Unnamed Tributary before Adams Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the Nehalem River and extends 699 meters. Two reaches were designated based on: Land use and valley form. In the first reach Scour Pools (34%) and Riffles (64%) dominated the habitat, while Silt/organics (17%), Sand (33%), and Gravel (39%) were the dominant substrate types. In the second reach Dammed and backwater pools (97%) dominated the habitat, while Silt/organics (56%) and Sand (32%) were the dominant substrate types. The survey begins at the confluence of the Nehalem River. An ODFW Spawning Survey sign was noted. The first reach is rural residential while the second reach runs through timberland. Beaver activity dominates the second reach. REACH DESCRIPTIONS: REACH 1: Length Ц 338 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces in a broad valley. The average valley width index is 20.0. Land use for the reach is rural residential. A sub dominant land use of second growth timber was also noted. The average unit gradient is 0.7%. The channel characteristics include: primary 338m and secondary 0m. Two pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 5.9 deep pools per 1 kilometer of primary stream length. There was one key piece of LWD, which averages to 0.3 pieces per 100m of primary channel. The vegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 15 Ц 30 cm dbh, with some deciduous 30 Ц 50 cm dbh. Blackberry patches were also present along the riparian areas. This survey begins at the confluence with the Nehalem River. An ODFW Salmon Spawning survey sign was observed. The stream segment below the road is influenced by high flows from the Nehalem River. The landowner appears to be fairly new (based on all of the work) and has planted young conifers with varying success. The stream passes thru a culvert, which is passable but rust and erosion lead to it being in poor condition. The reach ends at the start of beaver activity. There is good LWD project potential, with good access if landowner permission can be obtained. The riparian has some recent plantings, but there are numerous sections of the stream that need additional shade cover. So, a planting project would be beneficial. REACH 2: Length Ц 361 meters. The channel is constrained by hillslopes in a narrow valley. The average valley width index is 1.0. Land use for the reach is second growth timber. The average unit gradient is 2.5%. The channel characteristics include: primary 361m and secondary 0m. Five pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 13.9 pools per kilometer of primary stream length. There were four key pieces of LWD, which averages to 1.1 key pieces per 100m of primary channel. The vegetation is based on 1 riparian transect. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 3 - 15 cm dbh, with some deciduous 30 Ц 50 cm dbh. The reach begins at a large beaver dam that may be a fish barrier. Above the dam are several pools with good complexity. The survey ends due to the lack of suitable habitat above several large dams. This reach is not a high priority LWD project due to the narrow valley width. There is poor LWD recruitment with mostly alders found in the riparian area. So, a planting project that increased future LWD would be beneficial. C@№є№hh(D5БCJ\Бhh(D/BCtuФХ░▒▌▐    O p q Ж З Ь Э и й П С е ж ¤└!Нм¤└!е¤└!е¤└!е¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм@¤ж п ░ ту┴┬╚╔╥╙ЛНVW;=@¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤ └!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤ └!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм¤└!Нм 1Рh░╨/ ░р=!░"░#Ра$Ра%░ 5БCJ\БЬ@@ё @ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@Є бD Default Paragraph FontVi@є │V  Table Normal :V Ў4╓4╓ laЎ (k@Ї ┴(No List @        аzЩ   аzЩ@╙/BCtuФХ░▒▌▐ OpqЖЗЬЭийПСежп░ту┴ ┬ ╚ ╔ ╥ ╙ Л Н VW;=BШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААpШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААИШ0ААШ0ААИШ0АА АШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0АА АШ0ААШ0АА АШ0ААШ0ААШ0АА АШ0ААШ0АА АШ0ААШ0АА Ш0АА АШ0ААШ0АА(Ш0АА АШ0ААpШ0ААШ0ААpШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0АА АШ0ААpШ0АААШ0ААШ0АА@ ж @ @  z╟9$ъ{╟9ФOъ|╟9Ф№#}╟9Їъm╟9─X#Т╟9|V#У╟9дъФ╟9мъq╟9Мъr╟9 ъs╟9<ъt╟9▄ъu╟9─ъv╟9ьъw╟9|¤#x╟9╠ъy╟9м■#ААЖОЮ  ╘╘▄ЫЫгB     ЕНУУп  █ссвииB   8*Аurn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsАdateА=*Аurn:schemas-microsOle             5OlePres000    ,К ITEM000ODS     ITEM000FMT                    И;lXH  $Ч  Ё.√╝"System8$rэ╞0°E -√Ь Р@Times New Roman-  2 Zу -- 2 ▀у , 2 ▀,у , 2 ▀Xу ,√Л ╝@Times New Roman-J2 ▀Д*уUpper Nehalem Watershed Habitat AssessmentTAA44T4A:!4`u;'44.A3A[;@!&;'T--4..`4A' 2 ▀╔ у > 2 eу , 2 e,у , 2 eXу , 2 eДу , 2 e░у ,2 e▄ уStream ReportA'44;`T4A;4' 2 e├у > 2 ыу ?-R2 _/уSTREAM: Unnamed Tributary (before Adams Creek)8=C=HYH22,N,2=!22,"0!2,!3!,H3,N'C",,2" 2 _Ту ╬ 2 _` у - 2 ╥у -82 EуSUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River8HBBH9 HH22,!H,3,,NC2,! 2 Eпу . 2 ╕у -22 +уDATES: February 15, 2006HH==87,2!3,#0223222 2 +Йу - 2 Юу -L2 +уSURVEY CREW: Todd Boswell, Mark McLaughline8HCH=HCC=_=221B2'H,Y,!2Z-<,3222 2 ^у - 2 Ду -;2 ў уREPORT PREPARED BY: Ben WalczakC=8HC=8C<8HC=HBHB,2_,,-,2 2 ўау . 2 jу -/2 ▌уGENE CONSERVATION GROUP:H=H=CHH8=CHH> IHHCHH8 2 ▌╡у ' 2 ▌▄у12 2 ▌у-!2 ▌/уNCHC 2 ▌║у - 2 Pу -#2 ├уUTM COORDINATES:H=YCHHCI HH==8 2 ├╒у █2 ├░уStart 8,! 2 ├ЖуЦ2.2 ├╕у 0476587 E & 5095462 N 2222222=M2232222H 2 ├▌ у - 2 6у , 2 6,у , 2 6Xу , 2 6Ду ,2 6░уEnd =22 2 6jуЦ2.2 6Ьу 0476746 E & 5096211 N 2222222=M2232222H 2 6┴ у - 2 йу -)2  уUSGS MAPS: MarshlandH8H8YH88Y,!'2,22 2  у - 2 П у -)2  уGENERAL DESCRIPTION:H=H=CI<H=8CD8>!HH 2  Су - 2 u у - 2 ш у ,2 ш ,MуThe Unnamed Tributary before Adams Creek winter habitat survey begins at its =2,H22,N,2>!22,#02,!2!,H2,N'C!-,2H3,!2,2,'2!2.03-12','+2 [ уconfluence with the NN,22!2,2-,H22,H^2 [ u7уehalem River and extends 699 meters. Two reaches were ,3,,NC2,!,22,3,22'222N,,!'=H2",,,3,'H,!,С2 ╬ Yуdesignated based on: Land use and valley form. In the first reach Scour Pools (34%) and s2,'12,,22,',222<-322',,222,.0!3!N!22,!!'!,-,28,22!832'!22S!,22О2 A WуRiffles (64%) dominated the habitat, while Silt/organics (17%), Sand (33%), and Gravel C!!,'!22S!22N2,,22,2,2,H2,82!2,2,'!22S!8,22!22S",22H!,3,12 ┤ у(39%) were the dominant sW!22S!I,!,2,22N2,2'a2 ┤ ;9уubstrate types. In the second reach Dammed and backwater 22'!,,03,' 22,'-,222!,-,2H,NN,2,222,,2H,,!Л2 ' Uуpools (97%) dominated the habitat, while Silt/organics (56%) and Sand (32%) were the l222'!22S!22N2,,22,2,2,H2,82!2,2,'!22S!,228,22!32S!H-!,2,12 Ъ уdominant substrate types.W22N2,2'22'!,,02,' 2 Ъ √у - 2 у -И2 АSуThe survey begins at the confluence of the Nehalem River. An ODFW Spawning Survey e=2,'2!2.02-12',2,,22!2,2-,2!2,I,2,-NC2,!H2HH7_82-H22182!2.02 єуsign'12М2 єжVу was noted. The first reach is rural residential while the second reach runs through H,'22,2=2,!!'!,,,2'!3!,",'2,2,H2,2,',,222",-,2!32'2!2212_2 f8уtimberland. Beaver activity dominates the second reach.N2,!,22B-,2,!,,3022N2,,'2,'-,222!,,,2 2 f▄у . 2 ┘у , 2 ┘,у -(2 LуREACH DESCRIPTIONS: C=HCHH=8CD8> HI8 2 LJу , 2 ┐у -2 2уREACH 1:C=HCH2 2 2║у - 2 еу - 2 у ,2 ,уLength :<,312 2 _уЦ2v2 СGу 338 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces in a broad valley.222N,,!'=3,,2,23,',22'!,2,230,"!-,,'2,2!3,22,-02 x у Ч2 Л]уThe average valley width index is 20.0. Land use for the reach is rural residential. A sub =2,,2-!-1,3,.0H2322,3'222;,222(,!2!2,!-,,2'!3!,!,'2,2,H'22О2 ■Wуdominant land use of second growth timber was also noted. The average unit gradient is 22N2,2,222',2!',-2221!3H2N2,!H,','222,2=2,,2-!-1,231!,2,2'z2 qJу0.7%. The channel characteristics include: primary 338m and secondary 0m.22S=2,,3,22,,3,!-,,!','2,22,2!N,"0222N,22(,,222-#03N2 q у Two pools =H2222'Й2 фTуwere greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 5.9 deep pools per 1 kilometer of H,!,2!,,,!2,22N,-"2,,2H2,2,2,"-1,'2222,,2222'2,!223N,,!2!Л2 WUуprimary stream length. There was one key piece of LWD, which averages to 0.3 pieces s2!N,#0'!,,N,312>2,!,I,'22,2.02,,,3!;_HH2,2,2-!-1,'2222,,,'|2 ╩Kуper 100m of primary channel. The vegetation is based on 2 riparian transecs2,!222N2!2!N,#0,2-22,=2,2-1,,22'2,',2222!2-!,2!,2'--"2 ╩╙ уts. The trees '=2,!,,'-NANI 2 8 nr trees  -NANI'2222,,2222'2,!22N=2,!,H,',√╝"System &К    |ёд-NANIITEM000FMT#3     └F@гaL Ф╟@гaL Ф╟ITEM000FMTRich Text Format8            ?√Ole          OlePres000            O╪!#3Rich Text FormatatИ;lXp!Дў{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f36\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f37\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f39\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f40\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f41\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f42\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f43\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f44\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid3561263\rsid4466792} \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\rsidroot4466792 \fet0\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1 \pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5 \pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid3561263 \par \tab \tab \tab }{\b\fs28\insrsid3561263 Upper Nehalem Watershed Habitat Assessment \par \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab Stream Report \par \par }{\insrsid3561263 STREAM: Unnamed Tributary}{\insrsid4466792 (}{\insrsid3561263 before Adams Creek}{\insrsid4466792 )}{\insrsid3561263 \tab \par \par SUBBASIN: }{\insrsid4466792 Upper }{\insrsid3561263 Nehalem River \par \par DATES: February 15, 2006 \par \par SURVEY CREW: Todd Boswell, Mark McLaughlin \par \par REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben Walczak \par \par GENE CONSERVATION GROUP:\tab 1-NC \par \par UT}{\insrsid4466792 M COORDINATES:\tab Start \endash 0476587 E & 5095462 N}{\insrsid3561263 \par }{\insrsid4466792 \tab \tab \tab \tab End \endash 0476746 E & 5096211 N}{\insrsid3561263 \par \par USGS MAPS: Marshland \par \par GENERAL DESCRIPTION: \par \par }{\insrsid4466792 \tab The Unnamed T}{\insrsid3561263 ributary before Adams Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the Nehalem River}{\insrsid4466792 and extends 699}{\insrsid3561263 meters. Two reaches were designated based on: Land use and valley form. In the first reach Scour Pools (34%) and Riffles (64%) dominated the habitat, while Silt/organics (17%), Sand (33%), and Gravel (39%) were the dominant substrate types. In the second reach Dammed and backwater pools (97%) dominated the habitat, while Silt/organics (56%) and Sand (32%) were the dominant substrate types. \par \par The survey begins at the confluence of the Nehalem River. An ODFW Spawning Survey sign was noted. The first reach is rural residential while the second reach runs through timberland. Beaver activity dominates the second reach. \par \tab \par REACH DESCRIPTIONS: \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid3561263 REACH 1: \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid3561263 \par \tab Length \endash 338 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces in a broad valley. The av erage valley width index is 20.0. Land use for the reach is rural residential. A sub dominant land use of second growth timber was also noted. The average unit gradient is 0.7%. The channel characteristics include: primary 338m and secondary 0m. Two p o ols were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 5.9 deep pools per 1 kilometer of primary stream length. There was one key piece of LWD, which averages to 0.3 pieces per 100m of primary channel. The vegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. Th e trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 15 \endash 30 cm dbh, with some deciduous 30 \endash 50 cm dbh. Blackberry patches were }{\insrsid4466792 also present along the riparian areas.}{ \insrsid3561263 \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid3561263 This survey begins at the confluence with the Nehalem River. An ODFW Salmon Spawning survey sign was observed. The stream segment below the road is influenced by high flows from the Nehalem River. The landowner appears to be fairly new (based on all of the work) and has planted young conifers with varying success. The stream passes thru a culvert, oft-com:office:smarttags АPlaceTypeА=*Аurn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags АPlaceNameА9*Аurn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsАplaceА А15А2А2006АDayАMonthАYearў■wzЫЮ  _ b Г Ж BBuХЫ ╔ BB  Todd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellMark McLaughlinхh(D @А::И╤Тee::@@@  Unknown            GРЗz А Times New Roman5РАSymbol3&Р Зz А Arial"qИЁ╨hЄ[╡ж\╡ж F· F· !Ёа┤┤ББr499И3ГЁ▄H(Ё ?ф                     h(D  Ben Todd Boswellа┤┤ББ20 T         И;lXЦ! ╦С  Ё.√╝"Systemаюrэ╞0°E -√Ь Р@Times New Roman-  2 Zу f-- 2 ▀у f, 2 ▀,у f, 2 ▀Xу f,√Л ╝@Times New Roman-J2 ▀Д*уUpper Nehalem Watershed Habitat AssessmentTAA44T4A:!4`u;'44.A3A[;@!&;'T--4..`4A' 2 ▀╔ у f> 2 eу f, 2 e,у f, 2 eXу f, 2 eДу f, 2 e░у f,2 e▄ уStream ReportA'44;`T4A;4' 2 e├у f> 2 ыу f?-22 _уSTREAM: Unnamed Tributary8=C=HYH22,N,2=!22,"0 2 _∙у f 2 _у(f!&2 _4уbefore Adams Creek2,!3!,H3,N'C",,2 2 _pу)f" 2 _Ту f╬ 2 _` у f- 2 ╥у f-2 E уSUBBASIN: 8HBBH9 H2 E<уUpper H22,!2 EO уNehalem RiverH,3,,NC2,! 2 Eпу f. 2 ╕у f-22 +уDATES: February 15, 2006HH==87,2!3,#022which is passable but rust and erosion lead to it being in poor condition. The reach ends at the start of beaver activity.}{ \insrsid4466792 \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4466792 There is good LWD project potential, with good access if landowner permission can be obtained. The riparian has some recent plantings, but t here are numerous sections of the stream that need additional shade cover. So, a planting project would be beneficial.}{\insrsid3561263 \par \par REACH 2: \par \par \tab Length \endash 361 meters. The channel is constrained by hillslopes in a narrow valley. The average valley width index is 1.0. Land use for the reach is second growth timber. The average unit gradient is 2.5%. The channel characteristics include : primary 361m and secondary 0m. Five pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 13.9 pools per kilometer of primary stream length. There were four key pieces of LWD, which averages to 1.1 key pieces per 100m of primary channel.}{ \insrsid4466792 The vegetation is based on 1 riparian transect. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 3 - 15 cm dbh, with some deciduous 30 \endash 50 cm dbh. }{\insrsid3561263 \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid3561263 The reach begins at a large beaver dam that may be a fish barrier. Above the dam are several pools with good complexity. The survey ends due to the lack of suitable habitat above several large dams.}{\insrsid4466792 \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4466792 This reach is not a high priority LWD project due to the narrow valley width. There is poor LWD recruitment with mostly alders found in the riparian area. So, a planting project that increased future LWD would be beneficial.}{\insrsid3561263 \par \par \tab }} GROU3222 2 +Йу f- 2 Юу f-L2 +уSURVEY CREW: Todd Boswell, Mark McLaughlin8HCH=HCC=_=221B2'H,Y,!2Z-<,3222 2 ^у f- 2 Ду f-;2 ў уREPORT PREPARED BY: Ben WalczakC=8HC=8C<8HC=HBHB,2_,,-,2 2 ўау f. 2 jу f-2 ▌уGENE CONH=H=CHH#2 ▌ЎуSERVATION GROUP:8=CHH> IHHCHH8 2 ▌╡у f' 2 ▌▄у1f2 2 ▌у-f!2 ▌/уNCHC 2 ▌║у f- 2 Pу f-2 ├уUTH= 2 ├ЕуM COORDINATES:YCHHCI HH==8 2 ├╒у f█2 ├░уStart 8,! 2 ├ЖуЦf22 ├╕ у 0476587 E2222222=2 ├Е у & 5095462 NM2232222H 2 ├─ у f 2 ├▌ у f- 2 6у f, 2 6,у f, 2 6Xу f, 2 6Ду f,2 6░уEnd =22 2 6jуЦf22 6Ь у 0476746 E2222222=2 6i у & 5096211 NM2232222H 2 6и у f 2 6┴ у f- 2 йу f-)2  уUSGS MAPS: MarshlandH8H8YH88Y,!'2,22 2  у f- 2 П у f-)2  уGENERAL DESCRIPTION:H=H=CI<H=8CD8>!HH 2  Су f- 2 u у f- 2 ш у f,2 ш , уThe Unnamed T =2,H22,N,2>k2 ш ╗@уributary before Adams Creek winter habitat survey begins at its !22,#02,!2!,H2,N'C!-,2H3,!2,2,'2!2.03-12','72 [ уconfluence with the Nehalem Rz,22!2,2-,H22,H,3,,NC2 [ Єуiver2,!#2 [ Ну and extends 699,22,3,22'22242 [ 0у meters. Two reaches were N,,!'=H2",,,3,'H,!,С2 ╬ Yуdesignated based on: Land use and valley form. In the first reach Scour Pools (34%) and 2,'12,,22,',222<-322',,222,.0!3!N!22,!!'!,-,28,22!832'!22S!,22О2 A WуRiffles (64%) dominated the habitat, while Silt/organics (17%), Sand (33%), and Gravel C!!,'!22S!22N2,,22,2,2,H2,82!2,2,'!22S!8,22!22S",22H!,3,=2 ┤ !у(39%) were the dominant substrate!22S!I,!,2,22N2,2'22'!,,U2 ┤ w1у types. In the second reach Dammed and backwater 03,' 22,'-,222!,-,2H,NN,2,222,,2H,,!Л2 ' Uуpools (97%) dominated the habitat, while Silt/organics (56%) and Sand (32%) were the l222'!22S!22N2,,22,2,2,H2,82!2,2,'!22S!,228,22!32S!H-!,2,12 Ъ уdominant substrate types.e22N2,2'22'!,,02,' 2 Ъ √у f- 2 у f-И2 АSуThe survey begins at the confluence of the Nehalem River. An ODFW Spawning Survey e=2,'2!2.02-12',2,,22!2,2-,2!2,I,2,-NC2,!H2HH7_82-H22182!2.02 є уsign was not'12H,'22А2 єєNуed. The first reach is rural residential while the second reach runs through ,2=2,!!'!,,,2'!3!,",'2,2,H2,2,',,222",-,2!32'2!2212_2 f8уtimberland. Beaver activity dominates the second reach.N2,!,22B-,2,!,,3022N2,,'2,'-,222!,,,2 2 f▄у f. 2 ┘у f, 2 ┘,у f-(2 LуREACH DESCRIPTIONS::C=HCHH=8CD8> HI8 2 LJу f, 2 ┐у f-2 2уREACH 1:C=HCH2 2 2║у f- 2 еу f- 2 у f,2 ,уLength :<,312 2 _уЦf2y2 СIу 338 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces in a broad valley. o222N,,!'=3,,2,23,',22'!,2,230,"!-,,'2,2!3,22,-02 ЛуThe av=2,,2О2 ЛWуerage valley width index is 20.0. Land use for the reach is rural residential. A sub -!-1,3,.0H2322,3'222;,222(,!2!2,!-,,2'!3!,!,'2,2,H'22О2 ■Wуdominant land use of second growth timber was also noted. The average unit gradient is 22N2,2,222',2!',-2221!3H2N2,!H,','222,2=2,,2-!-1,231!,2,2'Ж2 qRу0.7%. The channel characteristics include: primary 338m and secondary 0m. Two po22S=2,,3,22,,3,!-,,!','2,22,2!N,"0222N,22(,,222-#03N=H2222 qy уols 2'Й2 фTуwere greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 5.9 deep pools per 1 kilometer of H,!,2!,,,!2,22N,-"2,,2H2,2,2,"-1,'2222,,2222'2,!223N,,!2!Л2 WUуprimary stream length. There was one key piece of LWD, which averages to 0.3 pieces s2!N,#0'!,,N,312>2,!,I,'22,2.02,,,3!;_HH2,2,2-!-1,'2222,,,'И2 ╩Sуper 100m of primary channel. The vegetation is based on 2 riparian transects. Thes2,!222N2!2!N,#0,2-22,=2,2-1,,22'2,',2222!2-!,2!,2'--'=2,2 ╩№ у trees :!,,'-NANI  2