ࡱ>    >+ !"#$%'()*K=-./0123456789:;?@ABCDEFGHIJPLMNWQRSTUVXYZ[\]^_`abcdeRoot Entry i, ITEM000  F0xDi,1Table&CompObjj՜.+,0 hp|   A  Title  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q%F\Object F4dMicrosoft Word DocumentD:\Youngs Bay final data\Stream reports\Lewis and Clark Tribs\Barrett Creek Report.docWordDocument" SummaryInformation( DocumentSummaryInformation8Oh+'0x   ( 4 @ LX`hpssAdrianne SchackartdriNormale Todd Boswellcka2ddMicrosoft Word 10.0@V@_D}@ @r\w 5@ bjbj22 " XX6666666JJJJ V]vvvvvvvv  $Ref6 vv 66vv   .6v6v    66 vj J  -0]   J$n66666 v `  vvvJ J Upper Nehalem Watershed Habitat Assessment Stream Report STREAM: Crawford Creek SUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River DATES: March 3, 2006 SURVEY CREW: Trevor Diemer, Ben Walczak REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben Walczak GENE CONSERVATION GROUP: 1-NC UTM COORDINATES: Start 0464172 E & 5088829 N End 0463987 E & 5090288 N USGS MAPS: Sager Creek GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Crawford Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the Nehalem River and extends 1,527 meters. Two reaches were designated based on: Valley width and Channel morphology. Riffles (46%) and scour pools (41%) dominated the habitat, while silt/organics (30%), sand (36%), and gravel (26%) were the dominant substrate types. The survey begins at the confluence of the Nehalem River. The stream runs through timberland. The first reach is affected by Nehalem River high flows. The surveyors believe that the lower stream may be a summer refuge in the first few hundred meters. The survey ends due to a lack of flow and debris jams. REACH DESCRIPTIONS: REACH 1: Length 1,200 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces alternating with hillslopes in a broad valley. The average valley width index is 3.3. Land use for the reach is second growth timber, with a subdominant land use of large timber. The average unit gradient is 1.1%. The channel characteristics include: primary 1,200m and secondary 75m. Four pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 3.1 deep pools per 1 km. There was a small amount of LWD with fifteen logs greater or equal to 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 1.3 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on 3 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 15 50 cm dbh, with some conifers 15 30 cm dbh. This survey begins in timberland. Heavy siltation from Nehalem River high flow events is present in this reach. This portion of the stream appears to function similar to a giant alcove during high flow events. There were some large pieces of wood that provide additional cover. There is little to no gravel in this reach. The riparian shade through this section of the stream is good. Ancient beaver complexes that are now grassy low terraces dominate the reach. There is poor LWD project potential with little to no access for industrial equipment. Additionally, the high flows from the Nehalem River would make it difficult to keep placements from floating away. The reach is characterized by silt/organics, sand, and small gravel dominating the substrate. The riparian area has good riparian shade throughout the entire reach. Low summer flow is a significant issue with this stream. REACH 2: Length 327 meters. The channel is constrained by moderate hillslopes in a narrow valley. The average valley width index is 1.8. Land use for the reach is large timber. The average unit gradient is 2.7%. The channel characteristics include: primary 327m and secondary 10m. Zero pools were greater than 1 meter deep. There was a high amount of LWD with nineteen logs greater or equal to 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 5.8 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on one riparian transect. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 15 50 cm dbh, with some conifers 3 15 cm dbh. This reach is dominated by poor habitat. Silt/organics (32%), sand (43%), and gravel (23%) are the dominant substrates. The riparian shade in this reach is good. This is a typical runout reach. The survey ended at a pinch point (old earthflow) just below a split. There were no visible signs of coho in this reach. There is poor LWD project potential in this reach. There is a lack of flow and no spawning gravel with numerous debris jams. The overall habitat was not impressive making this a low priority restoration site. The riparian area has good riparian shade throughout the entire reach. So, no planting project would be necessary. C\] hWhWhW5CJ\hW/BC[\{|/ P Q i j   # $ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$ - . 12JK!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1h/ =!"#$%@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List   z zY/BC[\{|/PQij #$-.12  J K 0000000000000 000 000 00000 00 0 00 00 0 0p0000000000000 $  U2U#V2X#W2Y#X2Z#Y2L[#Z2 #[2 \2#]2#^2#_2 `24Va2tVb2Vc2$&d2t#e2\qf2l#g2#h24#ggmu VV^jjr      ltzz ]ccqww    Ole 5OlePres000,ITEM000ODS ITEM000FMT;lX   ."System8$r0E -@Times New Roman-  2 Z -- 2  , 2 , , 2 X ,@Times New Roman-J2 *Upper Nehalem Watershed Habitat AssessmentTAA44T4A:!4`u;'44.A3A[;@!&;'T--4..`4A' 2  > 2 e , 2 e, , 2 eX , 2 e , 2 e ,2 e Stream ReportA'44;`T4A;4' 2 e > 2  ?-.2 _STREAM: Crawford Creek8=C=HYC!,H!2!2C",,2 2 _j . 2  -82 ESUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River8HBBH9 HH22,!H,3,,NC2,! 2 E . 2  -,2 +DATES: March 3, 2006HH==8Y,!,222223 2 + - 2  -G2 (SURVEY CREW: Trevor Diemer, Ben Walczak8HCH=HCC=_=!,22!H,N,!B,2_,,-,3 2  - 2  -;2  REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben WalczakC=8HC=8C<8HC=HBHB,2_,,-,2 2  . 2 j -/2 GENE CONSERVATION GROUP:H=H=CHH8=CHH> IHHCHH8 2  ' 2 12 2 -!2 /NCHC 2  - 2 P - 2 UH"2 HTM COORDINATES:=YCHHCI HH==8 2  2 Start 8,! 2 2.2  0464172 E & 5088829 N 2222222=M2232222H 2   - 2 6 , 2 6, , 2 6X , 2 6 ,2 6End =22 2 6j2.2 6 0463987 E & 5090288 N 2222222=M2232222H 2 6  - 2  -.2  USGS MAPS: Sager CreekH8H8YH888,1-!C",,2 2  b . 2  -)2  GENERAL DESCRIPTION:H=H=CI<H=8CD8>!HH 2   - 2 u  - 2  ,|2 ,KThe Crawford Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the =2,C!,H!3!2C!-,2H3,!2,2,'2!2.03-12',',22!2,2,,H22,Y2 [ 4Nehalem River and extends 1,527 meters. Two reachesH,2,,NC2,!,22,3,22'2222N,,!'=H2"-,,2,'42 [  were designated based on: lI,!,3,'13,,22-',2222 TValley width and Channel morphology. Riffles (46%) and scour pools (41%) dominated H,.0H22,22C2,22-N2!222230C!!,'!32S!,22',23!222'!23S!22N2,,22 A Wthe habitat, while silt/organics (30%), sand (36%), and gravel (26%) were the dominant 2,2,2,H2,'2!2,2,'!22S!(,22!22T!,222!,2,!22S!I,",2,22N2,2#2 substrate types.'22'!,,03,' 2 h . 2 '  -G2 (The survey begins at the confluence of t=2,'2!2.02-12',2,,22!2,2-,2!L2 B+he Nehalem River. The stream runs through o2,I,2,-NC2,!=2,'!,,N!23'2!22122 Ttimberland. The first reach is affected by Nehalem River high flows. The surveyors N2,!,22=2,!!'",,-2',!!,,,240H,3,,OC2,!212!2H'=3,(2!2.02!'2 Wbelieve that the lower stream may be a summer refuge in the first few hundred meters. 2,,2,2,2,2H-!'",,NN.02,,'2NN,!!-!22,22,!!'!-H2223!,2N,,!'J2 *The survey ends due to a lack of flow and =2,'2!2.0,32'22,2,,,22!!2H,222  debris jams.2,2!'-N' 2  - 2 f , 2 f, -(2 REACH DESCRIPTIONS::C=HCHH=8CD8> HI8 2 J , 2 L -2 REACH 1:C=HCH2 2  - 2 2 - 2  ,2 ,Length :<,312 2 _2w2 H 1,200 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces alternating with 2222N,,!'=2,,2,23,',22'!,2-230,"!-,,',-!2,31H22 Xhillslopes in a broad valley. The average valley width index is 3.3. Land use for the 2'22,'2,2!2,22,-0=3,,3,!-2,2,.0H2222,3'22;,222',!2!2,I2 )reach is second growth timber, with a sub !,,,2''-,2221!2H2N2,!H2,'22S2 0dominant land use of large timber. The average 22N2,3,222',2!,"1,N2-"=2,,2-!-1,2 Punit gradient is 1.1%. The channel characteristics include: primary 1,200m and 221!,2,2'22S=3,,2,23,,2,",,-!','2,22,2!N,#02222N,222 qVsecondary 75m. Four pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 3.1 deep ',,222,#022N722!232'H,!,1",,-!2,22O,,!2-,2H2,2,3,"-1-'2222,,2J2 *pools per 1 km. There was a small amount 222'2,!22N=2,!,I,','N,,N222O2 -of LWD with fifteen logs greater or equal to g2!;`HH2!!,,231'1!-,-!2!,22,22 WU12m x 0.6m, which averages to 1.3 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on 3 22N322NH2,2,2,!,1,'2223.02,,,'3,!222N=2,2-1,,22'2,',22222 Vriparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly !2,!,2!,2(,,'=2,",,'!2222N2'!",22,2022,!2-!,2-22,H-!,N2'0-NANI %    2 8 W&{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;} {\f36\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f37\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f39\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f40\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;} {\f41\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New ITEM000FMT#3 FD+D+ITEM000FMTRich Text Format8<&Ole  OlePres000O#3Rich Text Formatat;lXp!Roman (Hebrew);}{\f42\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f43\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f44\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);} {\f386\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f387\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Tahoma Cyr;}{\f389\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f390\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma Tur;}{\f391\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);} {\f392\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f393\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;}{\f394\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f395\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma (Thai);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255; \red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0; \red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs16\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \ssemihidden \styrsid9330555 Balloon Text;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid7736209\rsid9330555\rsid13785076} \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\rsidroot13785076 \fet0\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1 \pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5 \pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid13785076 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \tab \tab \tab }{\b\fs28\insrsid13785076 Upper Nehalem Watershed Habitat Assessment \par \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab Stream Report \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 STREAM: Crawford Creek \par \par SUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River \par \par DATES: March 3, 2006 \par \par SURVEY CREW: Trevor Diemer, Ben Walczak \par \par REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben Walczak \par \par GENE CONSERVATION GROUP:\tab 1-NC \par \par UTM COORDINATES:\tab Start \endash 0464172 E & 5088829 N \par \tab \tab \tab \tab End \endash 0463987 E & 5090288 N \par \par USGS MAPS: Sager Creek \par \par GENERAL DESCRIPTION: \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \tab The Crawford Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the Nehalem River and extends 1,527 meters. Two reaches were designated based on: Valley width and Channel morphology. Riffles (46%) and scour pools (41%) dominated the habitat, while silt/organics (30%), sand (36%), and gravel (26%) were the dominant substrate types. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 The survey begins at the confluence of t he Nehalem River. The stream runs through timberland. The first reach is affected by Nehalem River high flows. The surveyors believe that the lower stream may be a summer refuge in the first few hundred meters. The survey ends due to a lack of flow and debris jams. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \tab \par REACH DESCRIPTIONS: \par \par REACH 1: \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \tab Length \endash 1,200 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces alternating with hillslopes in a broad valley. The average valley width index is 3.3. Land use for the reach is second growth timber, with a sub dominant land use of large timber. The average unit gradient is 1.1%. The channel characteristics include: primary 1,200m and secondary 75m. Four pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 3.1 deep pools per 1 km. There was a small amount of LWD with fifteen logs greater or equal to 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 1.3 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on 3 riparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes of deciduous ranging from 1 5 \endash 50 cm dbh, with some conifers 15 \endash 30 cm dbh. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 This survey begins in timberland. Heavy s8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsdate=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace 20063DayMonthYear6?uyor:Todd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellTodd Landon BoswellMark McLaughlinW@ђ@@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial"qhq[x[\w \w !>4d 3H(?WAdrianne Schackart Todd Boswell;lX   ."System8$r0E -@Times New Roman-  2 Z -- 2  , 2 , , 2 X ,@Times New Roman-J2 *Upper Nehalem Watershed Habitat AssessmentTAA44T4A:!4iltation from Nehalem River high flow events is present in this reach. This portion of the stream appears to function similar to a giant alcove during high flow ev ents. There were some large pieces of wood that provide additional cover. There is little to no gravel in this reach. The riparian shade through this section of the stream is good. Ancient beaver complexes that are now grassy low terraces dominate the r each. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 There is poor LWD project potential with little to no access for industrial equipment. Additionally, the high flows from the Nehalem River would make it difficult to keep placements from floating away. The reach is characterized by silt/organics, sa nd, and small gravel dominating the substrate. The riparian area has good riparian shade throughout the entire reach. Low summer flow is a significant issue with this stream. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \par REACH 2: \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \tab Length \endash 327 meters. The channel is constrained by moderate hillsl opes in a narrow valley. The average valley width index is 1.8. Land use for the reach is large timber. The average unit gradient is 2.7%. The channel characteristics include: primary 327m and secondary 10m. Zero pools were greater than 1 meter deep. There was a high amount of LWD with nineteen logs greater or equal to 12m x 0.6m, which averages to 5.8 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on one riparian transect. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly mixed sizes o f deciduous ranging from 15 \endash 50 cm dbh, with some conifers 3 \endash 15 cm dbh. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 This reach is dominated by poor habitat. Silt/organics (32%), sand (43%), and gravel (23%) are the dominant substrates. The riparian shade in this reach is good. This is a typical runout reach. The survey ended at a pinch point (old earthflow) just below a split. There were no visible signs of coho in this reach. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 There is poor LWD project potential in this reach. There is a lack of flow and no spawning gravel with numerous debri s jams. The overall habitat was not impressive making this a low priority restoration site.}{\insrsid13785076\charrsid13785076 }{\insrsid13785076 The riparian area has good riparian shade throughout the entire reach. So, no planting project would be necessary. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13785076 \par }}'2!2,/2,12',',22!2,2,,H22,[2  5pNehalem River and extends 1,527 meters. Two reaches H,2,,NC2,!,22,3,22'2222N,,!'=H2!,,,2,'22  pwere designated based on: H,!,2,'12`u;'44.A3A[;@!&;'T--4..`4A' 2  > 2 e , 2 e, , 2 eX , 2 e , 2 e ,2 e Stream ReportA'44;`T4A;4' 2 e > 2  ?-.2 _STREAM: Crawford Creek8=C=HYC!,H!2!2C",,2 2 _j . 2  -82 ESUBBASIN: Upper Nehalem River8HBBH9 HH22,!H,3,,NC2,! 2 E . 2  -,2 +DATES: March 3, 2006HH==8Y,!,222223 2 + - 2  -G2 (SURVEY CREW: Trevor Diemer, Ben Walczak8HCH=HCC=_=!,22!H,N,!B,2_,,-,3 2  - 2  -;2  REPORT PREPARED BY: Ben WalczakC=8HC=8C<8HC=HBHB,2_,,-,2 2  . 2 j -/2 GENE CONSERVATION GROUP:H=H=CHH8=CHH> IHHCHH8 2  ' 2 12 2 -!2 /NCHC 2  - 2 P - 2 UH"2 HTM COORDINATES:=YCHHCI HH==8 2  2 Start 8,! 2 2.2  0464172 E & 5088829 N 2222222=M2232222H 2   - 2 6 , 2 6, , 2 6X , 2 6 ,2 6End =22 2 6j2.2 6 0463987 E & 5090288 N 2222222=M2232222H 2 6  - 2  -.2  USGS MAPS: Sager CreekH8H8YH888,1-!C",,2 2  b . 2  -)2  GENERAL DESCRIPTION:H=H=CI<H=8CD8>!HH 2   - 2 u  - 2  ,|2 ,KThe Crawford Creek winter habitat survey begins at its confluence with the =2,C!,H!3!2C!-,2H3,!2,2,'2!2.03-12',',22!2,2,,H22,Y2 [ 4Nehalem River and extends 1,527 meters. Two reachesH,2,,NC2,!,22,3,22'2222N,,!'=H2"-,,2,'42 [  were designated based on: lI,!,3,'13,,22-',2222 TValley width and Channel morphology. Riffles (46%) and scour pools (41%) dominated H,.0H22,22C2,22-N2!222230C!!,'!32S!,22',23!222'!23S!22N2,,22 A Wthe habitat, while silt/organics (30%), sand (36%), and gravel (26%) were the dominant 2,2,2,H2,'2!2,2,'!22S!(,22!22T!,222!,2,!22S!I,",2,22N2,2#2 substrate types.'22'!,,03,' 2 h . 2 '  -G2 (The survey begins at the confluence of t=2,'2!2.02-12',2,,22!2,2-,2!L2 B+he Nehalem River. The stream runs through o2,I,2,-NC2,!=2,'!,,N!23'2!22122 Ttimberland. The first reach is affected by Nehalem River high flows. The surveyors N2,!,22=2,!!'",,-2',!!,,,240H,3,,OC2,!212!2H'=3,(2!2.02!'2 Wbelieve that the lower stream may be a summer refuge in the first few hundred meters. 2,,2,2,2,2H-!'",,NN.02,,'2NN,!!-!22,22,!!'!-H2223!,2N,,!'J2 *The survey ends due to a lack of flow and =2,'2!2.0,32'22,2,,,22!!2H,222  debris jams.2,2!'-N' 2  - 2 f , 2 f, -(2 REACH DESCRIPTIONS::C=HCHH=8CD8> HI8 2 J , 2 L -2 REACH 1:C=HCH2 2  - 2 2 - 2  ,2 ,Length :<,312 2 _2w2 H 1,200 meters. The channel is constrained by terraces alternating with 2222N,,!'=2,,2,23,',22'!,2-230,"!-,,',-!2,31H22 Xhillslopes in a broad valley. The average valley width index is 3.3. Land use for the 2'22,'2,2!2,22,-0=3,,3,!-2,2,.0H2222,3'22;,222',!2!2,I2 )reach is second growth timber, with a sub !,,,2''-,2221!2H2N2,!H2,'22S2 0dominant land use of large timber. The average 22N2,3,222',2!,"1,N2-"=2,,2-!-1,2 Punit gradient is 1.1%. The channel characteristics include: primary 1,200m and 221!,2,2'22S=3,,2,23,,2,",,-!','2,22,2!N,#02222N,222 qVsecondary 75m. Four pools were greater than 1 meter deep, which averages to 3.1 deep ',,222,#022N722!232'H,!,1",,-!2,22O,,!2-,2H2,2,3,"-1-'2222,,2J2 *pools per 1 km. There was a small amount 222'2,!22N=2,!,I,','N,,N222O2 -of LWD with fifteen logs greater or equal to g2!;`HH2!!,,231'1!-,-!2!,22,22 WU12m x 0.6m, which averages to 1.3 key pieces per 100m. The vegetation is based on 3 22N322NH2,2,2,!,1,'2223.02,,,'3,!222N=2,2-1,,22'2,',22222 Vriparian transects. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zone were mostly !2,!,2!,2(,,'=2,",,'!2222N2'!",22,2022,!2-!,2-22,H-!,N2'0-NANI